Psychological scrutiny of Back bencher and front seater students

It is envisioned that both backbenchers and front seater students have their flying zone to gain career success. It is commonly observed that school front benchers score high in academic courses but cannot hold top technical or managerial rank at career dais whereas backbenchers rock in grabbing excellent jobs in giant multinational companies.

From a psychological viewpoint, students sitting in the front row are more attentive, staying in the radar of the teacher which enables them to effectively interact with the teacher in doubt clearing in the subject and giving prompt reply to academic questions. Through positive interaction they are well noticed and get opportunities to participate in school debate, cultural programs and school sports competitions. These are the positive aspects of front benchers in school in shaping their good career.

It is a myth that students sitting in the back row are the underperformers in the class because they do not alert and respond in teaching sessions.  When visualizing from a psychological angle, backbenchers in class may be real heroes in academic settings who touch the pinnacle in career. Front benchers can offer solutions to intricate academic issues whereas backbenchers are habitually armed to practically manage challenges and hindrances in achieving scholastic targets. Backbenchers are highly adroit in problem-solving.

From the voice of several teachers, back benchers are outstanding in their academic period because they have liberty to plan their studies, resilient and creative thinkers. They possess brilliant communicative skills. Their thought processes beyond the sky which can bring innovative ideas to execute in the real world and shape their bright career. These traits enable backbenchers to grab avenues and succeed in life.

In a lively scenario of undergraduate program, around sixty students were enrolled in one batch in which some were studious, others were mediocre and a group of students sat in back benches that were very playful and easy going. Normally, lecturers and professors delivered lectures of their subjects according to the time table. Backbenchers group assigned a funny title to every teacher. One of the professors was very short who taught agricultural subject So back benchers normally laughed at him and disturbed the whole class while he delivered the lecture. When one subject quiz was very close and most of the students were preparing to clear the quiz, one of the students in the backbencher group showed a funny face by fixing paper teeth on her mouth when the professor turned towards the blackboard and removed it when he faced the students. Whole class laughed loudly. Professor could not find the reason and asked to maintain silence as he was delivering a lecture on an important subject. Playful student repetitively acted like a funny figure and created a hilarious environment in the lecture room. Students were disturbed and could not understand what the teacher taught.  Front and middle benchers met with the teacher after the class to clear their doubts. But the naughty student was careless. Same day, in the evening, she called all his friends and batchmates in the hostel. She told everyone that I will revise the notes with you and within one hour she covered all the syllabus. Next day, all students appeared in the quiz. The results were astonishing as the backbencher who was doing a funny act yesterday scored brilliantly. It was also a surprise for the professor.

With the perspective of psychological science, front benchers put all efforts to score high in academic courses. Front benchers are disciplined, studious and the favorite of all the teachers. They are highly responsible and selected as class monitor to control students in class. In contrast, students sitting in back benches in the class are more active, sometimes behave differently, may break class discipline, are not sincere in studies, and gossip with classmates during tutorial or lecture. Backbenchers normally bunk classes that are boring, cut jokes, do not complete their educational task and get punishment from the teacher. These negative activities create hurdles in class and sometimes spoil the school environment.

Wrap up:

It is a critical debate among academicians about the success and failure of front seaters and backbenchers in the classroom. Sitting positions count a lot in ascending professional career and achieve set targets in life. Though front benchers are shining stars of class and have numerous moral values to create a positive environment in class still back benchers naturally trained in excelling their logical brain and problem-solving adeptness to be highly successful in their professional life. It can be deducted that not all backbenchers are successful in their professional mission. Some backbenchers may not accomplish good career objectives. It is a common consensus that backbenchers override front benchers in shaping professional life. 

Important note: Above article is based on environmental output and personal views of writer. Any resemblance is just a coincidence. Writer is not responsible for any disagreement.