Psychological diplomacies to enhance the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
In any crime situation, statements of the eyewitness are highly important for the progress of the investigation. Eyewitnesses have power to narrate original happenings at crime spots and assist in offering persuasive legal testimony. In simple expression, an eyewitness is the main observer of a crime scene in initial legal enquiry.
Eyewitness
evidence can immensely impact the process of criminal investigations and
courtroom judgements. Eyewitness testimony consists of collecting, storing and
recalling the relevant facts about the crime scene. Memories of crime happening
involve attention, encoding, short-term memory and long-term memory. Major
issue of storing memory is the decay of certain information with time.
Sometimes eyewitnesses misinterpret the images, voices and people involved in
crime.
There
is a heated incongruity among legal experts and criminal investigators on the
information provided by Eyewitness where crime occurred. Some
professionals support the eyewitness testimony and provide a strong base for
courtroom verdicts. On the contrary, challengers voice that eyewitness
testimony may be distorted and provide vague explanations of the scene of an
alleged crime.
There
are numerous factors that raise concern over the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.
According to criminal investigators, eyewitnesses can recollect precise
information of the crime that happened immediately. As time passes and rigorous
interrogation by police or investigators, memories of eyewitnesses may fade or
become contaminated which results in inaccurate or false convictions. Another
concern related to eyewitnesses’ testimony is the Memory decay. eyewitnesses
may not recollect important cues or data when they are interrogated after a
month as legal proceedings or trials take a long time for justice of the
victim.
Crime
events are horrifying and a person who witnesses the occurrence of crime may
undergo intense stress and trauma. In mentally disturbed conditions,
eyewitnesses lost their intellect to logically reproduce the details of crime
happening. Another strong factor that influences eyewitness convictions is the
ambiance of crime spots. These conditions may interfere in remembering or
recounting the step-by-step violent crime occurrence such as dim light,
distance, any bizarre sound. A person’s biases is another issue that misleads
the crime scene investigation.
Eyewitness
testimony can be more accurate with the involvement of Forensic psychologists.
Psychology experts apply myriads of tested psychological practices to convince
eyewitnesses and secure them to provide reliable and sequential information of
crime occurrence. Effective psychological tactics for collating accurate data
of crime spots from eyewitnesses include cognitive interviews and line-up
procedures. Forensic psychologists deeply interrogate eyewitnesses and ask
open-ended questions, using mental imagery, and inspire the witness to
recollect the edge details about the crime event. Forensic
psychology thoroughly investigates the relation between human behavior and facts
of crime happening from the angle of psychological theories to represent
authentic data collected by eyewitnesses.
Brief analytic note for legal authorities:
Crime
investigation is the challenging task of legal investigators. They rely on
eyewitness testimony to start the investigation process for alleged crime.
eyewitness testimony is helpful in the progress of investigation and legal
trials. Witnessing crime scenes, eyewitness testimony may be inaccurate due
memory decline, personal bias and misrepresentation of information. Forensic
psychologists contribute greatly to digging out the actual facts about crime
scenes through cognitive interviews and applying motivating tactics on
eyewitnesses.
Important note:
Above
article is composed on the basis of environmental inputs, and reveals the
expressions of the writer. Information provided in the article is for general
awareness. Readers must refer to legal experts for specific legal queries.
Any resemblance is just a coincidence. Writer is not responsible for any
disagreement.
Comments
Post a Comment